|
#241 from R&D
InnovatorVolume 5, Number 10
October 1996
Leadership
and Constructive Collaboration
by Sandra S. Donovan, Ph.D.
Dr.
Donovan, president of Donovan Associates in West Windsor, New
Jersey, consults to senior management on growth and increasing
profits (phone 609-936-1880).
She held management and executive positions at Standard Oil
Chemical, British Petroleum, Johnson & Johnson Materials, and
Horizons Research.
A
high-performance company is like a high-performance car and
driver. Proper
performance and integration of all components are critical.
Unanswered customer calls are like faulty wiring.
Missed production schedules are like misfiring sparkplugs.
A poor strategy is like an engine out of tune.
Poor internal communications are like a weak battery. Poor
morale is like a flat tire. And,
poor leadership is like a moving car whose driver has bailed out. Companies, like cars, need all components properly working,
and working in an integrated manner.
Such integration is even more important in today's
dynamically competitive environment.
Leaders of more
successful organizations understand that the role of managers and
executives has changed from control to being a facilitator for
subordinates achieving company goals.
In this article, I will cover three opportunities to
increase your leadership and your company's performance.
1.
Set a Collaborative Work Environment
I have witnessed
some very effective leaders achieve an open, collaborative
environment. Unfortunately,
the lack of collaboration is more common.
For example, in one company, the president verbally
insisted that his employees be collaborative and open, but he was
quite secretive, promoted turfism, and censored many who offered
constructive criticisms.
Constructive
collaboration is characterized by sharing information and
expertise widely. Some
examples are lending a data base, teaching subordinates, and
bringing knowledge to cross-functional teams.
Other examples are openness like circulating reports, being
accessible, being a good listener, encouraging candor, and showing
collegiality to all.
Constructive
collaboration isn't characterized by control, secretiveness, or
selfishness. Unfortunately,
there are many who do not yet recognize the importance of the
change in the role of managers and executives from control to
facilitative, or who cannot change because their style and ego are
so heavily rooted in control techniques.
The key to a
collaborative work environment is that many individuals at all
levels are responsible for achieving success.
The barriers
which most frequently limit organizations are:
*
Lack of equitable incentives and rewards at all functions
* Not all
contributors sharing in the rewards and recognition
* Intolerance of
constructively candid communication
* Insufficient
employee input and utilization
* Ineffective
allocation of resources
* Ineffective
procedures and processes
An example of
such a barrier is a department's prestige overshadowing that of
sister departments so as to make those employees feel like
second-class citizens. Individuals
feeling inferior are not likely to be motivated to perform at
their best.
Another common
example is that of employees not utilizing their full abilities
because company history has taught them that going the extra mile
goes unrewarded.
A third example
is an organization that has great difficulty in getting anything
done in spite of having camaraderie and good plans.
Often this is indicative of un-streamlined and ineffective
procedures and administrative processes.
Such problems are frequently due to a mismatched collection
of procedures, each with its own history and each having little
relationship to the others.
What
examples of lack of collaboration are you experiencing?
How can you change them?
2.
Promote Successful Teams
An ineffective or
inexperienced team leader is the primary reason for team failure.
The leader should be skilled in all principal aspects of
the team's responsibilities as well as guide their effective
integration. For
example, if the team's objective is to commercialize technology,
the team leader must be well versed in both technology and
business.
Another important
barrier to team success is lack of representation from all key
stakeholders. An
unfortunate example of this was when a vice president of marketing
in a manufacturing and marketing company wished to sell a new
product. He assembled
a team comprised of R&D, engineering, marketing, distribution,
and raw materials procurement.
Needless to say, this new product was never manufactured.
That might have not been the case if the team originally
included a manufacturing representative.
What
experiences do you have of a failed team?
Why did it fail?
3.
Focus on the Customer
A collaborative
environment and effective teams are wasted unless the focus for
these efforts is correct. The
correct focus must be customers.
The essence of customer focus is twofold.
First, an awareness of and an openness to what customers
need now, and second, an awareness of future trends so as to
anticipate the products and services that customers will want in
the future.
One can become
customer focused through everyday activities, by watching people,
by being aware of current events, and by talking to a diverse
network of individuals. Also,
each of us is a frequent customer, and we can apply to our
company's customers much of what satisfies or disappoints us in
our personal purchases.
Behaviors don't
change easily. Company
leadership can encourage a customer focus by example and by
appropriate incentives; for instance, rewards for proactive
interactions with potential customers.
What
opportunities have you missed for understanding your customers?
What should you do now to improve customer focus?
Synergy
People and
activities need to work synergistically.
Once people decide that they will cooperate and work
together, and that they are all in it together, actions for
achieving synergy will work themselves out, given an intelligent
approach towards the customer and playing from the
organization’s strength in creative ways.
Frequently, it is
clearer and easier to determine what needs to be done than it is
to do it. More
frequently the reason for this is that individuals who need to
work together don’t work together.
And, most often the reasons for this lack of cooperation is
not that people want to be difficult, but rather that:
1) incentives
have been directed to individual performance, and 2)
archaic internal procedures and systems become barriers.
The vast majority
of people want to do their best and are honestly doing the best
they can do in their environment.
In a nutshell, your challenges as managers and executives
is to create a supportive, collaborative, and enabling environment
with work content focused on customer needs linked to
organizational competencies through teamwork.
This complex
statement underscores the fact that there’s no simple and
painless elixir to achieve successful synergy within a few weeks.
However, there are well-proved principles, several of which
we have discussed, that can be employed.
This will require commitment, dedication, hard work,
intelligent application, and practice. The good news is that shortly after you begin to implement
the principles, you will begin to see some modest results which
will be like a shot of adrenaline to the organization.
As you continue to work at the synergy, the magnitude of
these results will increase.
If you stay on course, you’ll be quite pleased.
©
1996 Sandra Donovan
|