|
#359 from Innovative
Leader Volume 7, Number 9
September 1998
Art,
Science, and Leadership
by Dick Richards
Dick
Richards is an organization development consultant, training
designer, workshop leader, and speaker. This article is adapted from his book, Artful Work: Awakening Joy, Meaning, and Commitment in the Workplace
(Berrett-Koehler hardback, 1996, and Berkley paperback, 1997),
which won the Benjamin Franklin Award as best business book of
1996. Dick is located
in Cincinnati (phone 513-624-7477, e-mail dkrichards@aol.com).
Several years ago
a few colleagues and I created a questionnaire to provide feedback
to leaders about their “leadership behavior.”
We created a leadership model, designed a questionnaire and
feedback process that had a sound methodology and has proved
useful to many people. We
did our homework, validating the instrument with more than three
hundred leaders. The questionnaire, like others of its kind, describes
behaviors and characteristics of leaders.
During the time
we worked on the questionnaire, I felt a vague sense of discomfort
about our efforts; something seemed missing, but I couldn’t
grasp exactly what it might be.
I figured it out during a seminar on writing.
Art
Through Newton’s Lens
In a crowded
stifling room, fifty people are sitting on metal folding chairs at
the evening seminar. The
leaders are equipped with overhead transparencies showing data
they collected during a comprehensive research study.
Somehow they identified the dozen most-admired contemporary
American writers and calculated the average number of words per
sentence and average number of sentences per paragraph in those
writers’ works. The
presenters believed that writers would maximize their chances of
being successful by paying strict attention to these formulas.
The bored
audience collectively cheered when a woman in the back of the room
stood up and said, “Isaac Beshevis Singer is a friend of mine,
and I can tell you with absolute certainty that he doesn’t give
a damn about any of this.”
Good writing is
not gauged solely by the scientific study of average words per
sentence. It is
acclaimed, but not quantified, by the artistry it contains.
While measures like those gathered by the researchers may
provide useful guidelines, merely understanding them and applying
them is not likely to produce good writing.
Certainly if every sentence in this article were longer
than, say, twenty words, it is unlikely you would have read even
this far. However, it
is foolish to assume that we can understand good writing by
measuring it. There
is mystery—perhaps magic—within writing and other art forms.
Having tried to
be a good scientist about leadership, I seem to hear a voice from
the back of the room saying, “Leaders
don’t give a damn about any of this.”
Leadership cannot be adequately captured through Newton’s
lens—the view of science. Leadership,
like writing—or painting, or pottery—is an art form.
When we attend to behaviors and characteristics, we are
attending only to the surface.
Just as good
writing is not measured solely by average words per sentence, good
leadership is not measured by how often a person behaves a certain
way or by personal characteristics.
I know of a company that has created a list of eighty-two
“leadership behaviors.” The
company intends to use their list in performance evaluations of
managers. I suspect
this process will breed compliance rather than leadership.
I have known
effective and well-admired leaders who were deeply introverted,
and some whose gregariousness seemed to overwhelm whatever space
they were in. I have known some who seemed gentle and caring towards the
people around them, and others who were irascible and hard-edged.
I have known some who involved themselves deeply in
details, and others who preferred to hold to the big picture.
I have known some who were collaborative, and others who
were tyrannical.
Some leaders are
very precise about their vision.
Others are vague. I
know one very effective leader who absolutely refuses to elaborate
on the very brief vision, “Creating the intelligent universe.”
He says, “I know the people here want me to elaborate on
that. If I do, they
will stop thinking about what it might mean.
We are getting a whole lot of wonderful ideas from people
who are wondering what the hell ‘intelligent universe’ might
mean. As soon as I
start defining it, they will stop.”
Leadership
as an Art Form
There are only
two things that I can say with any degree of certainty about
leaders. First, you
know what they care about. Second,
they are interested in having you care about the same things.
Exactly how they let you know what they care about, and how
they work to interest you in the same things, is the leader’s
art form. Like any
art form, there are wide variations in technique and
interpretation.
Leaders make
their dreams, and the dreams of others, come true.
This is the art of leadership.
A leader’s dream is most often called a vision.
As artists, leaders swim in their own emotional and
spiritual undercurrents. Visions
emanate from the undercurrents.
Creating a vision is not a purely rational exercise.
It is an act of both inspiration and aspiration.
As inspiration, the act is “in spirit.”
The inspiration of a visionary emanates from a mysterious
source. As
aspiration, creating a vision expresses a desire to move “toward
spirit.” The
aspiration is the dream, the attempt to create a superior reality
to what currently exists.
Creating a vision
is an artist’s act of deciding both what is to be created and
why it is to be created, whether the thing is a pot, a book, a
poem, or a product, process, company, or manufacturing plant.
So leaders must
learn to trust their interior voices, the artist’s voice,
especially the small quiet voice that visits in moments of silence
and solitude. The voice is not always logical. Art teacher Robert Henri wrote:
“There are
moments in our lives, there are moments in a day, when we seem to
see beyond the usual -- become clairvoyant.
We reach then into reality.
Such are the moments of our greatest happiness.
Such are the moments of our greatest wisdom.
It is in the nature of all people to have these
experiences; but in our time and under the conditions of our
lives, it is only a rare few who are able to continue in the
experience and find expression for it.”
A leader strives,
or may be compelled, to be one of those rare few.
|